Big shock to the government in the CPS case

 An important decision of the court has come out today on the case of BJP MLA Satpal Satti challenging the appointment of CPS and this decision has dealt a huge blow to the present government. Senior BJP leader and MLA Satpal Sati had filed a petition in the Himachal Pradesh High Court through Additional Advocate General Punjab Haryana Satpal Jain, senior advocate Ankush Das, advocates Virbhadur Verma, Ankit Dhiman, Mukul Sharma and Rakesh Sharma.

While talking to the media about the decision, Virbhadur Verma said that the application for decision in the Honorable Himachal Pradesh High Court was moved by the present government on the merits and maintainability of this petition. In this, the decision has come in our favor, the government’s application has been rejected, as we are aware that Satpal Satti and 11 other MLAs had challenged their appointment in the High Court regarding the appointments of CPS. Last time the issue was raised on 3 October. It was placed before the court in which there was a long debate, the decision of which has come today. It is clear in this decision that the petition is maintainable, meaning it is worthy of being taken forward.

This petition has been filed again in the High Court on 16th October in which we have made an interim request. The question arises that what will happen in the interim request, if his appointment is stayed, then it will be considered a big decision, we have already clarified that this is a matter of public treasury and the Supreme Court of India has given a decision regarding this in the past also. Has narrated. The law of the Supreme Court is considered the law of the land.

In Assam and Manipur, a verdict has already been given on this matter and the Supreme Court believes that their appointment is unconstitutional. After today’s decision, our petition has reached the first stage.

In its application, the government had raised questions on the jurisdiction of 12 affidavits of the MLAs. We have given all those 12 affidavits to the court.

This was a case of irregularity or illegality and we would like to point out that cases of irregularities are rectifiable.

We are confident that we are moving forward strongly in this case and our hands are strong. On October 16, either the court will give the verdict or keep it reserved.